32 Years in Albuquerque, New Mexico
(505) 232-6818
Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994
Another look inside the sausage factory of Congress
In the annals of American history, few moments in Congress have had such far-reaching and dramatic consequences as the passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. This monumental piece of legislation forever altered the landscape of federal regulation, impacting the manufacturing, labeling, advertising, and sale of vitamins and dietary supplements across the United States. October 25, 1994, was a day of high stakes, with billions of dollars in potential profits for supplement companies on one side, and the very safety of American consumers hanging in the balance on the other. Dive into this riveting, blow-by-blow account of how a handful of misguided individuals in Washington crafted the foundation of our modern world, for better or worse.
References
-
Cohen, P. A. (2014). Hazards of hindsight — Monitoring the safety of nutritional supplements. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(14), 1277-1280. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1315559 URL: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1315559
-
Gahche, J., Bailey, R., Burt, V., Hughes, J., Yetley, E., Dwyer, J., ... & Sempos, C. (2011). Dietary supplement use among U.S. adults has increased since NHANES III (1988-1994). NCHS Data Brief, (61), 1-8. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db61.htm
-
Marcus, D. M., & Grollman, A. P. (2002). Botanical medicines: the need for new regulations. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(25), 2073-2076. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb022858 URL: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb022858
-
Rader, J. I., & Burdock, G. A. (2009). Regulatory status of dietary supplements in the United States. In Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease (pp. 783-792). Academic Press. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123741189000359
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/food/dietary-supplements/dietary-supplement-health-and-education-act-1994
​
It was a hotly contested battle in the halls of Congress, with politicians and corporate interests clashing as the future of the American dietary supplement industry hung in the balance. The year was 1994, and the Dietary Health and Supplement Act (DSHEA) was being fiercely debated, with passionate supporters and vehement detractors lining up on both sides of the aisle. This would prove to be a watershed moment for the nation, as the act would radically change the landscape of the supplement industry and redefine the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) authority.
Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah and Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa were the driving forces behind DSHEA. The two lawmakers had personal connections to the supplement industry: Hatch's home state of Utah was (and still is) a hub for dietary supplement manufacturers, while Harkin was a firm believer in alternative medicine and the potential benefits of supplements. On the other side of the battle were those who argued that the act would weaken the FDA's regulatory power, putting consumers at risk.
​
​
​
​
​
​
Today, the American dietary supplement market is a multi-billion dollar behemoth, with tens of thousands of products lining the shelves of supermarkets, pharmacies, and online retailers. However, this growth has come at a cost. The FDA's limited authority over dietary supplements means that manufacturers are not required to prove the safety or efficacy of their products before they hit the market. This has led to a proliferation of potentially dangerous and adulterated supplements, some of which have caused severe harm and even death.
The FDA is now struggling to keep up with the sheer volume of supplements flooding the market, with limited resources and authority to take action against potentially harmful products. The agency has been forced to adopt a reactive approach, only able to take action once a supplement has been linked to harm or death. This leaves consumers to navigate a largely unregulated market, putting their health and well-being at risk.
The consequences of this lax regulation have been devastating. In recent years, there have been numerous high-profile cases of contaminated and adulterated supplements causing serious harm to consumers. One such case involved a weight loss supplement called OxyElite Pro, which was linked to an outbreak of severe liver injuries and even a handful of deaths. The FDA eventually stepped in and recalled the product, but not before lives were lost and countless others were harmed.
Another shocking case involved a popular workout supplement called Craze, which was found to contain a methamphetamine-like substance not disclosed on the label. The dangerous ingredient was only discovered after several athletes failed drug tests due to the supplement. Once again, the FDA was forced to react after the damage had been done.
These incidents and countless others like them have sparked outrage among consumer advocates and health experts, who argue that the DSHEA has created a dangerous environment in which unscrupulous manufacturers can profit at the expense of public safety. They contend that the FDA's limited authority over dietary supplements has left a regulatory void that has been exploited by companies willing to cut corners and deceive consumers.
In response to these concerns, there have been calls for reforms to the DSHEA, with some advocating for increased FDA oversight and stricter regulations to ensure the safety and efficacy of supplements. Others argue that the industry should be held to the same rigorous standards as pharmaceutical drugs, with manufacturers required to provide evidence of safety and effectiveness before their products can be sold.
The debate over the future of the dietary supplement industry continues to rage on, with passionate voices on both sides. The legacy of the DSHEA, born out of a heated congressional battle in 1994, has cast a long shadow over the American supplement market, with consumers left to navigate a landscape fraught with potential danger.
As the public becomes increasingly aware of the risks posed by unregulated supplements, the pressure for change mounts. The story of the Dietary Health and Supplement Act of 1994 serves as a cautionary tale, a reminder of the high stakes and human cost of deregulation. It is a story that should provoke not just anger, but also a call to action, to ensure that the health and safety of the American public is not sacrificed at the altar of corporate profit.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
The tension in Congress was palpable as powerful corporate sponsors and lobbyists representing supplement manufacturers worked tirelessly to secure support for the act. Companies like Herbalife, Nature's Sunshine, and Nu Skin, among others, funneled millions of dollars into lobbying efforts, determined to see the bill become law. The stakes were high, as the outcome of this legislative showdown would determine the fate of an industry valued in the billions of dollars.
n the end, the proponents of the act emerged victorious. The DSHEA was signed into law on October 25, 1994, marking a turning point in the history of dietary supplements in the United States. The act defined supplements as a separate category from food and drugs, granting them a unique regulatory status. This new classification effectively removed the FDA's authority to regulate dietary supplements in the same manner as prescription medications. Prior to the act, supplements were relatively rare and typically only available through health food stores or by prescription. The passage of DSHEA opened the floodgates, and the supplement industry exploded.
​
